I am not sure low security space trade hubs would come of this. Being as a single system would be fairly easy to camp and if it were a hub then it would surely be profitable to camp it often.

Yes but not for low sec trade hubs, the incentives would be far to low for non pirates. It would be pirates ganking other pirates. Imagine if all the drug dealers in one town tried to sell their drugs in one warehouse, they would shoot each other non stop.

I accept new ideas and what not, but you're essentially FORCING people to go through lowsec to get to the other side. You're wanting to bottle neck the industrial capacity, and the moving of assets. This will only support the PvPers. You're essentially changing the game from a sandbox style, to a set play style which CCP is absolutely against.


There needs to be a balance, and as of right now, there really isn't a balance in Low-Sec. It's not as profitable as it used to be, not a lot of people go there. So, I do support the idea of changing lowsec, but what you're suggesting is preposterous, and completely left winged.



Like I said, I support changes to lowsec and nullsec. Lowsec should be slightly more profitable than high sec, and that nullsec needs to be more profitable than high/low. There needs to be a reason to FIGHT for it.

Nullsec alliance can prevent people from docking in their stations with 100% certainty. Pirates being smaller groups that do not have the luxury of owning their own stations only import goods on demand for members' wishlists. I doubt their would be any reason for this to change with pirates having more to shoot at.

Wonder if a developer has even read this thread. Because CCP always listens and has had a record of prioritizing their resources into things that expand gameplay every expansion cycle. Right?